Good, I have all the IDs I need. Now let me run the copy-count win rate queries for both cards across both main and sideboard.
The queries had comments at the top that likely caused the parse error. Let me retry without leading comment lines.
Here is the full breakdown for Pauper Jund Midrange since January 1, 2026 (308 entries across 41+ tournaments):
MAKESHIFT MUNITIONS
Mainboard (copies played):
0 copies: 31 entries — 57.2% WR (83W-62L)
1 copy: 277 entries — 49.7% WR (592W-598L)
2-4 copies: no entries recorded
Sideboard (copies played):
0 copies: 303 entries — 50.6% WR (663W-647L)
1 copy: 4 entries — 55.0% WR (11W-9L)
2 copies: 1 entry — 20.0% WR (1W-4L)
Takeaway: Makeshift Munitions is a near-universal 1-of in the mainboard (90% of lists run exactly 1), yet the small sample of lists that omit it entirely actually post a better win rate (57.2% vs 49.7%). That gap is worth watching but note the n=31 for the 0-copy bucket is small. Sideboard adoption is very low; the data is too thin to draw conclusions there.
GO FOR THE THROAT
Mainboard (copies played):
0 copies: 299 entries — 50.2% WR (648W-643L)
1 copy: 3 entries — 50.0% WR (5W-5L)
2 copies: 5 entries — 63.3% WR (19W-11L)
4 copies: 1 entry — 75.0% WR (3W-1L)
Sideboard (copies played):
0 copies: 250 entries — 51.0% WR (563W-542L)
1 copy: 22 entries — 45.2% WR (42W-51L)
2 copies: 36 entries — 51.1% WR (70W-67L)
Takeaway: Go for the Throat is largely absent from Jund Mid mainboards — only 9 of 308 entries ran any copies. The higher win rates for 2 and 4 copies (63.3% / 75%) are tantalizing but the sample sizes are tiny (5 and 1 entries respectively) so treat them as anecdotal. In the sideboard, 58 entries include 1-2 copies, with 2 copies matching the 0-copy baseline at ~51% and 1 copy dipping to 45.2%.
Overall, neither card shows a statistically robust positive correlation with improved win rates in this dataset. Munitions is a maindeck staple but not clearly pulling its weight; Go for the Throat is a fringe sideboard option. Both warrant further investigation at larger sample sizes.
Sources: Data from 308 Jund Midrange entries across 41 Pauper tournaments (Jan 1 - Mar 31, 2026). Sources: 42% MTGO, 38% Melee, 20% Cardsrealm.
https://melee.gg/Decklist/View/ef482284-206d-4571-9d0d-b41c00c169bc
https://melee.gg/Decklist/View/eba80a29-c415-40d6-bf70-b41b01146bdb
https://www.mtgo.com/decklist/pauper-challenge-32-2026-03-2712836750