← Back to Sessions

Amulet Titan Spell Winrate Comparison

1 requestsStarted 9/17/2025, 6:45:17 PM
compare the winrates of malevolent rumble, explore, and green sun’s zenith in the mainboard of modern amulet titan. Only consider if a list is running 2 or more of a given spell

I'll analyze the winrates of Malevolent Rumble, Explore, and Green Sun's Zenith in Modern Amulet Titan decks, comparing lists that run 2+ copies of each spell.

Now I'll query the database to compare winrates of Amulet Titan decks running 2+ copies of each spell:

🛠️QueryPerformance of Key Cards in Amulet Deck

Let me also get recent tournament sources to provide citation:

Amulet Titan Spell Comparison: 2+ Copies Analysis

Based on the last 2 months of Modern tournament data, here's how these spells perform in Amulet Titan lists running 2+ copies:

Green Sun's Zenith: 54.5% winrate (37 entries)

  • 97 wins, 81 losses, 18 draws
  • Average: 2.62-2.19 record per tournament

Explore: 50.9% winrate (150 entries)

  • 349 wins, 336 losses, 46 draws
  • Average: 2.33-2.24 record per tournament

Malevolent Rumble: 50.0% winrate (45 entries)

  • 93 wins, 93 losses, 15 draws
  • Average: 2.07-2.07 record per tournament

Key Insights:

  • Green Sun's Zenith shows the highest winrate despite being the least popular option
  • Explore is the most widely adopted (150 entries vs 37-45 for the others)
  • Malevolent Rumble has exactly even win/loss performance
  • GSZ lists tend to perform better on average (2.62 wins vs 2.33 and 2.07)

The data suggests Green Sun's Zenith may be the strongest choice when committing 2+ slots, though it sees less adoption than Explore.

Sources:

Data from 85 tournaments: 84.7% MTGO, 15.3% Melee