← Back to Sessions

Session de713225

1 requestsStarted 8/31/2025, 6:09:01 AM
on the last 60 days, is oculus played in all dimir frog lists? Do the ones with it perform better?

I'll analyze Oculus usage in Dimir Frog lists over the last 60 days and compare performance between lists that do and don't play it.

🛠️Get Archetype Cards

I don't see Oculus in the top 30 cards for Dimir Frog lists. Let me search for it specifically and check if it appears at all in these decks.

🛠️Query

Now let me compare the performance of Dimir Frog lists with and without Abhorrent Oculus:

🛠️Query

Let me get some tournament sources for this analysis:

Abhorrent Oculus in Dimir Frog Lists (Last 60 Days)

No, Oculus is NOT played in all Dimir Frog lists:

  • Only 24 out of 125 decks (19.2%) play Abhorrent Oculus
  • When played, it's typically a 4-of (96 total copies across 24 decks = 4.0 average)

Performance Comparison:

  • With Oculus: 47.3% winrate (43-48 record, 24 entries)
  • Without Oculus: 50.5% winrate (213-209 record, 101 entries)

The data shows lists WITHOUT Oculus perform better by 3.2 percentage points. This suggests Abhorrent Oculus is either:

  • A meta call that didn't pay off during this period
  • Being tested by players but not providing a competitive advantage
  • A sideboard consideration that some moved to mainboard

The vast majority of successful Dimir Frog pilots (80.8%) are choosing not to include Oculus in their mainboard configuration.

Sources:
Data from 73 tournaments: 89% MTGO, 11% Melee. Recent events include Modern Challenge 32 and Modern Challenge 64.