Good — "Blue Belcher" and "Tameshi Bloom" are two distinct Modern archetypes. The user likely means one or both. Let me get the winrates for both over the specified date range, and also add the alias for "Tameshi Blue Belcher" pointing to Blue Belcher (since the key cards show Goblin Charbelcher and Lotus Bloom, which is the classic Blue Belcher shell, while Tameshi Bloom is a separate deck). Actually, let me reconsider — "Tameshi/Blue Belcher" with a slash likely means the user is asking about both separately, or it's a combined deck. Let me get winrates for both archetypes in the date range.
Hey @acc_receivable! These are actually two separate Modern archetypes, so here is the breakdown for each from July 14 to today (July 28, 2026):
Blue Belcher: 51.4% winrate (37W-35L-0D across 72 matches, mirrors excluded). Solid and slightly above 50/50, consistent with its longer-term 51.6% average.
Tameshi Bloom: No recorded matches in this date window. The deck had only 1 tournament of data in its recent history (14 entries at 46.5%), and appears to be largely absent from the competitive scene right now.
If "Tameshi/Blue Belcher" refers to a combined or hybrid list you have seen circulating, it may be getting filed under the Blue Belcher archetype in the database. The Blue Belcher shell (Goblin Charbelcher, Lotus Bloom, full MDFC manabase) is what is showing activity, so that 51.4% figure is the most relevant number for you.
Sources: Data from 41 Modern tournaments July 14-28, 2026 (66% MTGO, 34% Melee).