ā† Back to Sessions

Tron Deck Variants Winrate Performance Analysis

1 requestsStarted 10/6/2025, 2:20:27 PM
can you display the winrate of tron decks including sowing mycospawn compared to tron decks including glaring fleshrakers compared to tron decks including portent of calamity to tron decks including Tezzeret, Cruel Captain over the last month

I'll analyze the winrate performance of Tron decks with different card inclusions over the last month. Let me start by getting the necessary card and archetype information, then query the database for the comparison.

Let me try the correct name for Tezzeret:

Now let me get information about Tron archetypes:

Now let me query the database to compare winrates of Tron decks with each of these cards over the last month:

šŸ› ļøQueryTron Deck Variant Winrates Last Month

Now let me get tournament sources for citation:

Tron Deck Variant Winrate Comparison (Last Month)

Here's the winrate analysis for different Tron variants based on card inclusions over the past month:

1. Tezzeret, Cruel Captain Tron: 61.8%

  • 23 tournament entries
  • 76-47 match record (9 draws)
  • Highest performing variant

2. Glaring Fleshraker Tron: 53.8%

  • 139 tournament entries
  • 356-306 match record (43 draws)
  • Most popular variant by far

3. Sowing Mycospawn Tron: 52.1%

  • 34 tournament entries
  • 85-78 match record (11 draws)
  • Moderate adoption

4. Portent of Calamity Tron: 50.0%

  • 13 tournament entries
  • 36-36 match record (1 draw)
  • Lowest performing and least adopted

Key Insights:

  • Tezzeret, Cruel Captain shows the highest winrate at 61.8%, though with a smaller sample size (23 entries)
  • Glaring Fleshraker is the dominant choice with 139 entries and solid 53.8% winrate
  • Sowing Mycospawn has decent performance at 52.1% with moderate adoption
  • Portent of Calamity sits at exactly 50% winrate with very limited play

The data suggests Tezzeret builds are performing exceptionally well, while Glaring Fleshraker represents the current mainstream approach with consistent results.

Sources:
Data from 54 tournaments: 83.3% MTGO, 16.7% Melee. Recent examples: 2nd Chance PTQ (PT EOE), Modern Challenge 32, Modern Challenge 32.