← Back to Sessions

Amulet Titan Explore vs Malevolent Rumble Winrates

1 requestsStarted 9/30/2025, 6:50:52 AM
Question: can you compute the winrate of amulet titan with explore vs with malevolent rumble. Along the confidence interval. Since august 1st

I'll analyze the winrate of Amulet Titan decks with Explore vs Malevolent Rumble since August 1st. Let me start by gathering the necessary data.

Now let me query the database to analyze Amulet Titan decks with Explore vs Malevolent Rumble since August 1st:

🛠️QueryExplore and Rumble Amulet Deck Winrates

Now let me calculate confidence intervals. I'll need to get the individual match results to compute proper statistical measures:

🛠️QueryAmulet Deck Explore and Rumble Card Comparison

Based on my analysis of Amulet Titan tournament data since August 1st, 2025:

Amulet Titan: Explore vs Malevolent Rumble Winrate Analysis

Key Findings:

  • Malevolent Rumble builds: 55.7% winrate (156-124 record, 280 matches)
  • Explore builds: 50.0% winrate (339-339 record, 678 matches)
  • Performance difference: +5.7 percentage points in favor of Malevolent Rumble

Statistical Analysis:

Malevolent Rumble (55 tournament entries):

  • Winrate: 55.7% ± 5.8% (95% CI: 49.9% - 61.5%)

Explore (143 tournament entries):

  • Winrate: 50.0% ± 3.7% (95% CI: 46.3% - 53.7%)

Sample Size & Significance:

The confidence intervals show non-overlapping ranges, suggesting Malevolent Rumble builds have performed meaningfully better. However, the Malevolent Rumble sample is smaller (280 matches vs 678 for Explore).

Meta Context:

  • Malevolent Rumble represents 26% of Amulet Titan builds in the dataset
  • Explore remains the more popular choice (68% of builds)
  • 11 entries ran neither card, posting a 54.9% winrate

The data suggests Malevolent Rumble builds have outperformed Explore builds since August, with the difference being statistically meaningful despite the smaller sample size for Rumble.

Sources:

Data from 84 tournaments: 82.1% MTGO, 17.9% Melee