← Back to Sessions

Psychic Frog Transforms Modern Zoo Winrate

1 requestsStarted 9/17/2025, 6:52:24 PM
compare the winrates of modern zoo lists with/without cosmogoyf? With/wo quantum riddler? With/wo psychic frog?

I'll analyze Modern Zoo lists comparing winrates with and without those specific cards. Let me start by getting the Zoo archetype details and searching for those cards.

I notice the archetype overview returned Legacy Zoo instead of Modern. Let me search for Modern Zoo specifically and then analyze the card usage data.

πŸ› οΈQueryZoo Archetype Tournament Entries Count

Let me fix the SQL query (SQLite uses LIKE with COLLATE NOCASE instead of ILIKE) and then analyze the card usage:

πŸ› οΈQueryZoo Archetype Tournament Entries by Format

Great! Now let me analyze the winrates for Domain Zoo lists with and without each of the three cards. I'll use the Domain Zoo archetype ID and examine recent tournaments:

πŸ› οΈQueryPsychic Frog Impact on Tournament Performance
πŸ› οΈQueryCosmogoyf Impact on Tournament Performance
πŸ› οΈQueryQuantum Riddler Impact on Zoo Tournament Performance

Now let me get some tournament sources for citation:

Based on my analysis of Modern Domain Zoo lists over the past 2 months (237 entries):

Card Winrate Comparison:

🐸 Psychic Frog: +10.9% winrate boost

  • With Psychic Frog: 60.6% winrate (7 entries, 20-13 record)
  • Without Psychic Frog: 49.7% winrate (230 entries, 532-539 record)

🧩 Quantum Riddler: -3.8% winrate penalty

  • With Quantum Riddler: 46.2% winrate (2 entries, 6-7 record)
  • Without Quantum Riddler: 50.0% winrate (235 entries, 546-545 record)

🦴 Cosmogoyf: No data available

  • 0 Domain Zoo entries played Cosmogoyf in the analyzed period
  • All 237 entries were without Cosmogoyf (50.0% winrate)

Key Findings:

  • Psychic Frog shows the strongest positive correlation with success, though with a small sample size (7 entries vs 230)
  • Quantum Riddler appears to underperform, but sample size is extremely small (2 entries)
  • Cosmogoyf sees zero adoption in competitive Domain Zoo builds

The Psychic Frog data suggests it may be a powerful inclusion, but the small sample size requires caution in drawing definitive conclusions.

Sources:

Data from 95 tournaments: 84.2% MTGO, 15.8% Melee