I'll analyze Amulet Titan's performance by comparing different build variations. Let me start by getting the archetype information and checking for these specific cards.
Now let me search for the specific cards to get their IDs for the analysis:
That's not the right "Rumble" card. Let me search more specifically:
I think "rumble" might refer to a different card. Let me check what other common Amulet Titan cards there are and query the database to see what builds exist:
I see there are very few decks with 2+ Aftermath Analyst mainboard (only 3). Let me check what other cards might be referred to as "rumble" - perhaps you meant a different card? Let me also get a broader view of Amulet Titan cards to understand the variations:
Perfect! I found "Malevolent Rumble" - that must be what you meant by "rumble". Now let me analyze the performance of these three build variations by getting their matchup winrates. First, let me get the winrates for each build type:
Now let me get matchup data for each build type by analyzing their performance against different opponent archetypes:
Now let me get sources to cite this analysis:
Based on tournament data from July-September 2025, here's how different Amulet Titan builds perform:
vs Domain Zoo:
vs Boros Energy:
vs Ruby Storm:
vs Tron:
vs Esper Blink:
GSZ builds appear strongest overall with superior performance against Domain Zoo and better consistency. Explore builds dominate Tron matchups and represent the mainstream approach. Rumble builds show promise against specific matchups like Domain Zoo but struggle against combo decks like Ruby Storm and control matchups like Esper Blink.
The GSZ package seems to provide the most balanced performance across the meta, while Explore remains the safe, consistent choice with strong big mana matchups.
Data from 110 tournaments (84.5% MTGO, 15.5% Melee): Modern Challenge 32, Modern Showcase Challenge, 1º Torneio Super Modern