← Back to Sessions

Domain Zoo Fable Meta Performance Analysis

1 requestsStarted 9/9/2025, 12:35:57 PM
are domain zoo decks performing better or worse in the general meta with four copies of fable of the mirror breaker in the last two months?

I'll analyze Domain Zoo's performance with 4 copies of Fable of the Mirror-Breaker over the last two months. Let me gather the data step by step.

Now I'll query the database to compare Domain Zoo decks with exactly 4 copies of Fable vs those without it, over the last two months (July 8 - September 8, 2025):

🛠️QueryFable Count Impact on Tournament Deck Performance

Let me also get the overall Domain Zoo performance for comparison:

Based on the tournament data analysis, Domain Zoo decks with 4 copies of Fable of the Mirror-Breaker are performing worse than other configurations:

Performance Breakdown (Last 2 Months):

Domain Zoo with 4 Fable copies: 49.0% winrate (70W-73L)

  • 35 tournament entries
  • Significantly underperforming the archetype average

Domain Zoo without Fable: 56.1% winrate (96W-75L)

  • 35 tournament entries
  • Best performing configuration

Domain Zoo with <4 Fable copies: 49.0% winrate (396W-412L)

  • 179 tournament entries (most common configuration)
  • Also underperforming

Overall Domain Zoo average: 50.1% winrate

Key Insights:

  • The 4-copy Fable builds are underperforming by 7.1 percentage points compared to Fable-free builds
  • Both 4-copy and partial Fable configurations show the same 49.0% winrate, suggesting Fable may not be optimal in the current meta
  • Domain Zoo without Fable shows the strongest performance at 56.1% winrate
  • Most players (179/249 entries) are running partial Fable counts, but this hasn't translated to better results

The data suggests that Domain Zoo performs better without Fable of the Mirror-Breaker in the current Modern meta.

Sources: Data from 96 tournaments: 84.4% MTGO, 15.6% Melee. Recent examples: Modern Challenge 32, Modern Challenge 64