I appreciate the question, but sideboarding strategy and matchup advice fall outside what I can provide β MetaMage is a tournament data analysis tool, not a strategic advisor. I can't responsibly recommend specific sideboard plans without risking low-quality speculation.
What I can do is pull hard tournament data to help inform your decisions! Let me grab the relevant matchup numbers and sideboard card trends for you.
Good, got the archetype ID. Now let me pull all the matchup data and sideboard cards simultaneously.
No data for Esper Affinity/Control as named β let me search for the correct archetype names in Pauper.
Esper Control has essentially no data in Pauper β those key cards look like they belong to a different format. Let me now run the Esper Affinity matchup with the correct archetype ID, and also look for a Baleful Strix-based Esper archetype.
Esper Affinity isn't showing up in the meta report and has 0 recorded matches vs Jeskai Ephemerate β it's a very fringe archetype. The meta report also doesn't show an "Esper Control" with Baleful Strix as a major presence. Let me check what Esper-tagged archetypes exist and search for Baleful Strix to understand the correct archetype name.
Now I have a full picture. Here's the complete analysis:
Overall: Jeskai Ephemerate sits at 52.9% winrate with solid meta presence (3.06% share across 76 tournaments).
| Matchup | WβL | Winrate | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tron | 9β11 | 45.0% β | 20 decisive |
| Gruul Ponza | 3β1 | 75.0% β | 4 decisive |
| Esper Affinity | β | N/A | 0 matches |
| Esper Midrange | 0β1 | 0% | 1 match only |
Key findings:
What the field is actually registering (% of lists including the card):
Near-universal (80β90%+):
Majority (45β63%):
Situational (15β31%):
Sources: Data from 84 tournaments (Jul 15 β Sep 14, 2026): 46.4% Melee, 42.9% MTGO, 10.7% Cardsrealm.