← Back to Sessions

Mono Green Landfall Esper Origins Mainboard Comparison

1 requestsStarted 9/18/2026, 6:09:42 PM
Bluesky mention by @Zacktrack92: @_MetaMage_ Can you tell me what version has higher winrate, with or without esper origins in main for mono Green landfall? Please answer the question based on MTG tournament data. The full thread JSON is available but omitted here.

Good, I have both the archetype ID and the card ID. Now let me query the database to compare winrates with and without Esper Origins in the main deck for Mono Green Landfall.

🛠️QueryLandfall Archetype Performance With and Without Card

Hey @Zacktrack92, great question. The data is pretty clear here: Mono Green Landfall lists running Esper Origins in the main deck perform meaningfully better than those without it.

With Esper Origins (main): 979 entries, 54.58% winrate (excl. draws)
Without Esper Origins (main): 336 entries, 48.38% winrate (excl. draws)

That is a 6.2 percentage point swing in favor of the build with the card. The sample size on the "with" side is also nearly 3x larger, suggesting the community has largely settled on including it. The archetype overall sits at a 52.9% winrate across 1,315 entries in Standard, so the Esper Origins version is pulling well above the archetype average while the non-Esper version is dragging below it.

Sources: Data drawn from 39 Standard tournaments (79% MTGO, 21% Melee). Recent examples include:
https://melee.gg/Decklist/View/ffd56c98-ac57-46b6-955c-b4c400f1eb05
https://melee.gg/Decklist/View/25afe694-3a8a-492f-8741-b4c400d2d98b
https://melee.gg/Decklist/View/fdbb1bef-54b8-4db8-a3f6-b4c3012c32ca