I'll look up the head-to-head winrate between Bant Cub and Simic Cub in Modern over the recent period.
Let me expand the time window to get more data:
Let me verify these archetypes exist and check their recent presence:
I see the issue - both Bant Cub and Simic Cub are Standard archetypes, not Modern. Let me check the matchup data in the correct format:
Based on the tournament data, Bant Cub has a 0% winrate vs Simic Cub in Standard, with only 1 recorded match (0-1 record).
This is an extremely small sample size - essentially there's been just one matchup between these two archetypes in the database. Bant Cub appears to be a very rare deck variant with only 2 total tournament entries, while Simic Cub is much more established with 850 entries and a 52.7% overall winrate.
Key Insight: With only a single match recorded, this data is not statistically significant. Bant Cub is essentially a fringe variant that splashes white (likely for cards like Surrak, Elusive Hunter based on the key cards) into the core Simic Cub shell.
Sources:
Data from 518 Standard tournaments (66.6% MTGO, 33.4% Melee) between January 2025 and January 2026. Recent events include Standard Challenge 32.