I'll analyze the matchup data for these two Affinity configurations against the requested archetypes. Let me start by gathering the necessary information.
Now let me search for Cranial Ram (the likely card name for "weapons manufacturing"):
Let me check if "Cranial Ram" might be what you meant, or search for the actual card:
Let me try another search - perhaps you meant a different card. Let me search more broadly:
Perfect! Found "Weapons Manufacturing". Now let me query the database to compare these two Affinity configurations across all the requested matchups:
Let me fix the schema issue:
Great! Now let me get the matchup data for both variants against all the requested archetypes:
I see the issue - all wins/losses/draws are showing as 0. This suggests a problem with how the matches table records results. Let me investigate the data structure:
The data exists. Let me check the issue more carefully - I think the problem is that I'm counting all matches (including non-result records). Let me rewrite the query:
Perfect! Now I have the data. Let me check if "titan" includes multiple variants:
Let me re-run the query to include all Titan variants:
Excellent! Now let me check if Eldrazi Ramp exists or has different naming:
Perfect! "Ramp Eldrazi" exists. Now let me get the final complete dataset:
Perfect! Now let me get sources to cite:
Now let me calculate winrates and confidence intervals. For confidence intervals, I'll use the Wilson score interval which is appropriate for binomial proportions:
Based on the tournament data from the last 3 months (July 16 - October 16, 2025), here's the matchup comparison:
| Matchup | W-L-D | Winrate | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affinity (mirror) | 25-21-4 | 54.3% | 39.0-69.1% |
| Titan (all variants) | 11-14-1 | 44.0% | 24.4-65.1% |
| Jeskai Blink | 3-1-0 | 75.0% | 19.4-99.4% |
| Goryo Reanimator | 29-14-3 | 67.4% | 52.0-80.5% |
| Blue Belcher | 15-4-1 | 78.9% | 54.4-93.9% |
| Domain Zoo | 6-10-0 | 37.5% | 15.2-64.6% |
| Boros Energy | 20-22-5 | 47.6% | 31.4-64.2% |
| Neobrand | 8-5-1 | 61.5% | 31.6-86.1% |
| Azorius Control | 15-9-1 | 62.5% | 40.6-81.2% |
| Eldrazi Ramp | 4-8-2 | 33.3% | 9.9-65.1% |
| Tron | 19-17-0 | 52.8% | 35.5-69.6% |
| Matchup | W-L-D | Winrate | 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Affinity (mirror) | 21-28-2 | 42.9% | 28.8-57.8% |
| Titan (all variants) | 12-27-3 | 30.8% | 16.5-48.7% |
| Jeskai Blink | 0-3-1 | 0.0% | 0.0-70.8% |
| Goryo Reanimator | 23-18-1 | 56.1% | 39.7-71.5% |
| Blue Belcher | 26-31-4 | 45.6% | 32.0-59.7% |
| Domain Zoo | 32-24-2 | 57.1% | 42.2-71.2% |
| Boros Energy | 56-68-4 | 45.2% | 36.1-54.4% |
| Neobrand | 13-10-0 | 56.5% | 34.5-76.8% |
| Azorius Control | 12-16-2 | 42.9% | 24.5-62.8% |
| Eldrazi Ramp | 10-6-2 | 62.5% | 35.4-84.8% |
| Tron | 23-40-6 | 36.5% | 24.7-49.7% |
Best improvements with Rebuke + Manufacturing:
Worse with Rebuke + Manufacturing:
Statistical notes:
The Rebuke + Manufacturing build appears stronger against combo (Goryo, Belcher) and control (Azorius, counterspells), while sacrificing percentage against aggressive midrange decks (Zoo, Eldrazi Ramp).
Data from 134 Modern tournaments (83.6% MTGO, 16.4% Melee):