I can provide tournament data analysis on sideboard card usage in Ruby Storm, but I should clarify that this tool analyzes what cards are played rather than their specific matchup performance. Let me gather the available data.
First, let me check if Ruby Storm is present in our database and get some recent tournament data:
Now let me get the sideboard cards used in Ruby Storm over the last 60 days:
Now let me check the Ruby Storm vs Domain Zoo matchup performance to provide context:
Let me get recent tournament sources for this data:
Based on tournament data analysis, here are the most commonly used sideboard cards in Ruby Storm (last 60 days):
Top Sideboard Cards in Ruby Storm:
• Prismatic Ending - 89% of decks (3.0 avg copies) - versatile removal
• Phlage, Titan of Fire's Fury - 58% of decks (1.7 avg copies) - threat/lifegain
• Orim's Chant - 55% of decks (3.7 avg copies) - combo protection
• Fire Magic - 66% of decks (1.9 avg copies) - damage/removal
• Wear // Tear - 52% of decks (1.2 avg copies) - artifact/enchantment hate
• Blood Moon - 42% of decks - manabase disruption
• Veil of Summer - 34% of decks (3.0 avg copies) - counterspell protection
Ruby Storm vs Domain Zoo Matchup: 40.9% winrate (18-26 record) over 44 decisive matches, indicating this is a challenging matchup for Ruby Storm.
Important Note: This analysis shows sideboard card adoption rates, not specific matchup performance data. The most relevant anti-Zoo cards appear to be Prismatic Ending (universal removal), Phlage (threat that gains life), and Fire Magic (versatile damage). Orim's Chant helps protect the combo against interaction.
Sources:
Data from 74 tournaments: 89% MTGO, 11% Melee. Recent examples: Modern Showcase Challenge, 1º Torneio Super Modern, Modern Challenge 32