I appreciate the question, but I need to clarify what this tool can and cannot do.
What I can provide:
- Tournament performance data (winrates, meta share, trends)
- Deck composition and card choices
- Matchup statistics
- Meta analysis based on actual tournament results
What I cannot provide:
- Subjective assessments of deck difficulty
- Strategic gameplay advice
- Skill-based rankings without tournament data
Deck difficulty is inherently subjective and depends on factors like:
- Mechanical complexity (number of decision points, stack interactions)
- Sequencing requirements
- Matchup knowledge needed
- Sideboarding complexity
- Pilot experience level
What I can do instead:
I could show you the current top Modern decks by performance using tournament data, which might help you identify decks to research further. Would you like me to:
- Generate a meta report showing the top Modern decks by win rate and presence over the last 30-60 days?
- Analyze specific archetypes you're curious about in terms of their performance trends?
- Compare matchup spreads for different decks (more even matchup spreads sometimes indicate higher skill ceilings)?
For actual difficulty assessments, I'd recommend checking out content from pro players, deck guides, or communities like r/ModernMagic or Modern-focused Discord servers where pilots discuss their experience with different archetypes.
Would you like me to pull current meta data to help inform your decision?