← Back to Sessions

Simic Cub Winrates Standard Past Month

1 requestsStarted 3/9/2026, 3:21:18 AM
breakdown winrates for simic cub in standard over the past month, but only report on results in which the pilot is splashing white to include some amount of Brightglass Gearhulk and seam rip in the main board. What is the winrate for this deck into the top 20 decks in standard? How does it fare against the new mono-white deck featuring 4x momo friendly flier? How does it fare against the trending izzet midrange (prowess) deck?

Let me gather all the data I need in parallel — starting with the archetype overview, format meta, and card searches simultaneously.

🛠️Get Meta Report

Good. Now I have the card IDs and archetype data. Let me now:

  1. Find entries with Brightglass Gearhulk + Seam Rip in the Simic Cub mainboard
  2. Get the mono-white archetype overview
  3. Get the Izzet midrange archetype overview
🛠️QuerySimic Cub Decks With Both Gearhulk And Rip

The mono-white search returned Pauper, and Izzet Midrange returned Legacy — I need to search more specifically. Let me also fix the database query and look up the correct archetypes in Standard.

🛠️QuerySplash Archetype Performance Metrics Date Range
🛠️QueryMono white archetypes in specific format
🛠️QueryIzzet and Prowess Archetypes by Format

Zero entries for the Bant splash variant — the card IDs may differ. Let me verify which card IDs are actually appearing in Simic Cub mainboards, and check which mono-white deck runs 4x Momo. I'll also check the izzet midrange trends.

🛠️Get Archetype Trends
🛠️QuerySimic Cub Brightglass Gearhulk Seam Rip Card Occurrences
🛠️QueryMono-white archetypes running maximum Momo copies

The query_database calls are failing due to comment syntax. Let me rewrite them without SQL comments and also look up the Izzet Midrange Standard archetype and Momo query.

🛠️QueryCard usage by archetype and board position
🛠️QueryCard Popularity by Archetype in Format

Interesting — Brightglass Gearhulk and Seam Rip have zero presence in Simic Cub mainboards. And Momo is primarily in Boros Dragons (294 entries, 4x average), not a mono-white deck. Let me now verify this by checking the archetype cards and also look deeper at what archetype contains Momo + is closest to the "new mono-white with Momo" description, and get the proper Standard Izzet Midrange winrate.

🛠️Get Archetype Cards

Now I have good clarity. Brightglass Gearhulk and Seam Rip don't appear in Simic Cub mainboards at all — this is a pure GU deck. And Momo is a key card in Boros Dragons, not a mono-white deck. Let me now get the matchups for Simic Cub vs Boros Dragons and Simic Cub vs Izzet Midrange, and also check overall Simic Cub winrate for context.

Now let me get the top-20 matchup winrates for Simic Cub vs all the top archetypes, and pull sources.

🛠️QueryMatchup winrate against opponent archetypes

The match result filtering issue (wins/losses showing 0) is because the result field uses different values. Let me check the correct result encoding and use the dedicated matchup tools instead.

🛠️Get Archetype Trends
🛠️QueryArchetype Match Results by Outcome in Date Range

Now I have all the data I need. Let me compile the full response.


⚠️ Important Data Caveat — Bant Splash Does Not Exist in the DB

Before diving in: there are zero tournament entries of Simic Cub running Brightglass Gearhulk + Seam Rip in the mainboard over the past month. The archetype is registered as a pure GU (Simic) shell across all 522 entries — no white splash variants have been recorded in competition. All matchup data below reflects standard Simic Cub as it's actually being played.


📊 Simic Cub — Standard Snapshot (Feb 3 – Mar 5, 2026)

  • Presence: 6.7% of the meta (#5 overall)
  • Overall WR (excl. mirror): 49.3% — a slightly below-50 performer at the moment

The deck is a pure GU ramp shell: Llanowar Elves → Badgermole Cub → Craterhoof Behemoth, with Nature's Rhythm, Gene Pollinator, and Spider Manifestation as core pieces. No white mana sources, no Brightglass Gearhulk, no Seam Rip.


🆚 Simic Cub vs. Top 20 Standard Archetypes

OpponentWRMatchesFavored?
Landfall64.2%386✅ Favored
Dimir Midrange54.9%176✅ Slight Edge
Reanimator55.9%34✅ Slight Edge
Temur Harmonizer60.0%40✅ Favored
Izzet Portal64.7%34✅ Favored
Azorius Control61.3%31✅ Favored
Dimir Control54.6%22✅ Slight Edge
Izzet Lessons49.3%365➖ Even
Mono Red Aggro46.3%82❌ Slight Dog
Jeskai Control44.0%100❌ Slight Dog
Dimir Excruciator46.1%191❌ Slight Dog
Azorius Midrange42.2%147❌ Dog
Temur Elementals38.9%36❌ Dog
Izzet Elementals36.8%38❌ Dog
Izzet Midrange39.9%148❌ Dog
Boros Dragons32.2%87❌ Hard Dog
Bant Airbending Combo27.6%58❌ Very Hard Dog
Izzet Spellementals19.7%132❌ Severe Dog

🐉 vs. "New Mono-White with 4x Momo" → Actually Boros Dragons

Momo, Friendly Flier is indeed a 4-of staple, but in Boros Dragons — not a mono-white deck. The archetype pairs it with Clarion Conqueror, Magmatic Hellkite, Nova Hellkite, and Sarkhan, Dragon Ascendant.

Simic Cub vs. Boros Dragons: 32.2% WR (28W–59L, 87 matches)
This is a very bad matchup. The Dragon fliers simply go over the top of Simic Cub's ground creature plan.


⚡ vs. Izzet Midrange (Prowess/Trending)

Simic Cub vs. Izzet Midrange: 39.9% WR (59W–89L, 148 matches)

Izzet Midrange is genuinely trending — it spiked to 23.8% presence in the Mar 2–8 window and boasts a 56.9% overall WR in the past month. The matchup is a meaningful loss for Simic Cub. The Izzet deck's interaction suite and tempo plays line up well against the slow ramp plan.


Sources — Data from 87 Standard tournaments (65.5% Melee, 34.5% MTGO):